[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCacux8K+ocWbRQ2@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:20:27 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Bjarni Jonasson <bjarni.jonasson@...rochip.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 1/3] net: phy: mscc: adding LCPLL reset to VSC8514
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 03:06:41PM +0100, Bjarni Jonasson wrote:
> +static u32 vsc85xx_csr_read(struct phy_device *phydev,
> + enum csr_target target, u32 reg);
> +static int vsc85xx_csr_write(struct phy_device *phydev,
> + enum csr_target target, u32 reg, u32 val);
> +
Hi Bjarni
No forward definitions please. Move the code around so they are not
required. Sometimes it is best to do such a move as a preparation
patch.
> @@ -1569,8 +1664,16 @@ static int vsc8514_config_pre_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
> {0x16b2, 0x00007000},
> {0x16b4, 0x00000814},
> };
> + struct device *dev = &phydev->mdio.dev;
> unsigned int i;
> u16 reg;
> + int ret;
Hard to say from the limited context, but is reverse christmass tree
being preserved here?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists