[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210212164900.53a9a452@carbon>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:49:00 +0100
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V1] net: adjust net_device layout for cacheline
usage
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:00:58 +0100
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:33:02 +0100
> Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > On 1/26/21 6:39 PM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > The current layout of net_device is not optimal for cacheline usage.
> > >
[...]
> > > @@ -1877,6 +1876,23 @@ struct net_device {
[...]
> > > +
> > > netdev_features_t features;
> > > netdev_features_t hw_features;
> > > netdev_features_t wanted_features;
> >
> > Probably wanted_features, hw_features are not used in fast path, only
> > in control path ?
>
> Yes, that was also my analysis. I did consider moving those down, but
> I wanted to keep the first iteration simple ;-)
I've send a followup[1] to address this, thanks for pointing it out.
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/161313782625.1008639.6000589679659428869.stgit@firesoul/
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists