netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: use AF_LOCAL instead of AF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 12 Feb 2021 19:40:06 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: use AF_LOCAL instead of AF_INET in xsk.c

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Tue,  9 Feb 2021 14:18:26 -0800 you wrote:
> We have the environments where usage of AF_INET is prohibited
> (cgroup/sock_create returns EPERM for AF_INET). Let's use
> AF_LOCAL instead of AF_INET, it should perfectly work with SIOCETHTOOL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> ---
>  tools/lib/bpf/xsk.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] libbpf: use AF_LOCAL instead of AF_INET in xsk.c
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1e0aa3fb05f8

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html