[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXLMk+4VuHr8WyLE1fxNV5hsN7JvA2PoDOmnZ4beJOH7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2021 11:07:04 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
jwi@...ux.ibm.com, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
Marek Lindner <mareklindner@...mailbox.ch>,
sw@...onwunderlich.de, a@...table.cc, sven@...fation.org,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, dsahern@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] mld: convert from timer to delayed work
On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 9:51 AM Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com> wrote:
> -static void mld_dad_start_timer(struct inet6_dev *idev, unsigned long delay)
> +static void mld_dad_start_work(struct inet6_dev *idev, unsigned long delay)
> {
> unsigned long tv = prandom_u32() % delay;
>
> - if (!mod_timer(&idev->mc_dad_timer, jiffies+tv+2))
> + if (!mod_delayed_work(mld_wq, &idev->mc_dad_work, msecs_to_jiffies(tv + 2)))
IIUC, before this patch 'delay' is in jiffies, after this patch it is in msecs?
[...]
> -static void mld_dad_timer_expire(struct timer_list *t)
> +static void mld_dad_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> - struct inet6_dev *idev = from_timer(idev, t, mc_dad_timer);
> + struct inet6_dev *idev = container_of(to_delayed_work(work),
> + struct inet6_dev,
> + mc_dad_work);
>
> + rtnl_lock();
Any reason why we need RTNL after converting the timer to
delayed work?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists