lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 13 Feb 2021 22:20:39 +0200
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 04/13] nexthop: Add implementation of resilient
 next-hop groups

On Sat, Feb 13, 2021 at 12:38:47PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> On 2/8/21 1:42 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
> > index 5d560d381070..4ce282b0a65f 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/nexthop.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/nexthop.c> @@ -734,6 +834,22 @@ static struct nexthop
> *nexthop_select_path_mp(struct nh_group *nhg, int hash)
> >  	return rc;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static struct nexthop *nexthop_select_path_res(struct nh_group *nhg, int hash)
> > +{
> > +	struct nh_res_table *res_table = rcu_dereference(nhg->res_table);
> > +	u32 bucket_index = hash % res_table->num_nh_buckets;
> 
> Have you considered requiring the number of buckets to be a power of 2
> to avoid the modulo in the hot path? Seems like those are the more
> likely size options.

We thought about it, but I think it is overly limiting. Even in Spectrum
(for some sizes) it does not have to be a power of 2.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ