[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfd61c5a-c5fd-e0d9-fb60-be93f1c98735@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 11:27:15 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>, kuba@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, saeedm@...dia.com, hch@....de,
sagi@...mberg.me, axboe@...com, kbusch@...nel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, edumazet@...gle.com, smalin@...vell.com
Cc: boris.pismenny@...il.com, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, benishay@...dia.com, ogerlitz@...dia.com,
yorayz@...dia.com, Ben Ben-Ishay <benishay@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Yoray Zack <yorayz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 07/21] nvme-tcp: Add DDP data-path
On 2/11/21 2:10 PM, Boris Pismenny wrote:
>
> +static int nvme_tcp_teardown_ddp(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue,
> + u16 command_id,
> + struct request *rq)
> +{
> + struct nvme_tcp_request *req = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
> + struct net_device *netdev = queue->ctrl->offloading_netdev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!netdev)) {
> + dev_info_ratelimited(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device, "netdev not found\n");
again, unnecessary. you only get here because the rquest is marked
offloaded and that only happens if the netdev exists and supports DDP.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + ret = netdev->tcp_ddp_ops->tcp_ddp_teardown(netdev, queue->sock->sk,
> + &req->ddp, rq);
> + sg_free_table_chained(&req->ddp.sg_table, SG_CHUNK_SIZE);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void nvme_tcp_ddp_teardown_done(void *ddp_ctx)
> +{
> + struct request *rq = ddp_ctx;
> + struct nvme_tcp_request *req = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
> +
> + if (!nvme_try_complete_req(rq, req->status, req->result))
> + nvme_complete_rq(rq);
> +}
> +
> +static int nvme_tcp_setup_ddp(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue,
> + u16 command_id,
> + struct request *rq)
> +{
> + struct nvme_tcp_request *req = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
> + struct net_device *netdev = queue->ctrl->offloading_netdev;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (unlikely(!netdev)) {
> + dev_info_ratelimited(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device, "netdev not found\n");
similarly here. you can't get here if netdev is null.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + req->ddp.command_id = command_id;
> + ret = nvme_tcp_req_map_sg(req, rq);
> + if (ret)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = netdev->tcp_ddp_ops->tcp_ddp_setup(netdev,
> + queue->sock->sk,
> + &req->ddp);
> + if (!ret)
> + req->offloaded = true;
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int nvme_tcp_offload_socket(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue)
> {
> struct net_device *netdev = queue->ctrl->offloading_netdev;
> @@ -343,7 +417,7 @@ static void nvme_tcp_resync_response(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue,
> return;
>
> if (unlikely(!netdev)) {
> - pr_info_ratelimited("%s: netdev not found\n", __func__);
> + dev_info_ratelimited(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device, "netdev not found\n");
and per comment on the last patch, this is not needed.
> @@ -849,10 +953,39 @@ static int nvme_tcp_recv_pdu(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> static inline void nvme_tcp_end_request(struct request *rq, u16 status)
> {
> + struct nvme_tcp_request *req = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(rq);
> + struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue = req->queue;
> + struct nvme_tcp_data_pdu *pdu = (void *)queue->pdu;
> union nvme_result res = {};
>
> - if (!nvme_try_complete_req(rq, cpu_to_le16(status << 1), res))
> - nvme_complete_rq(rq);
> + nvme_tcp_complete_request(rq, cpu_to_le16(status << 1), res, pdu->command_id);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int nvme_tcp_consume_skb(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, struct sk_buff *skb,
> + unsigned int *offset, struct iov_iter *iter, int recv_len)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TCP_DDP
> + if (test_bit(NVME_TCP_Q_OFF_DDP, &queue->flags)) {
> + if (queue->data_digest)
> + ret = skb_ddp_copy_and_hash_datagram_iter(skb, *offset, iter, recv_len,
> + queue->rcv_hash);
> + else
> + ret = skb_ddp_copy_datagram_iter(skb, *offset, iter, recv_len);
> + } else {
> +#endif
why not make that a helper defined in the CONFIG_TCP_DDP section with an
inline for the unset case. Keeps this code from being polluted with the
ifdef checks.
> + if (queue->data_digest)
> + ret = skb_copy_and_hash_datagram_iter(skb, *offset, iter, recv_len,
> + queue->rcv_hash);
> + else
> + ret = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, *offset, iter, recv_len);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_TCP_DDP
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int nvme_tcp_recv_data(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, struct sk_buff *skb,
> @@ -899,12 +1032,7 @@ static int nvme_tcp_recv_data(struct nvme_tcp_queue *queue, struct sk_buff *skb,
> recv_len = min_t(size_t, recv_len,
> iov_iter_count(&req->iter));
>
> - if (queue->data_digest)
> - ret = skb_copy_and_hash_datagram_iter(skb, *offset,
> - &req->iter, recv_len, queue->rcv_hash);
> - else
> - ret = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, *offset,
> - &req->iter, recv_len);
> + ret = nvme_tcp_consume_skb(queue, skb, offset, &req->iter, recv_len);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(queue->ctrl->ctrl.device,
> "queue %d failed to copy request %#x data",
> @@ -1128,6 +1256,7 @@ static int nvme_tcp_try_send_cmd_pdu(struct nvme_tcp_request *req)
> bool inline_data = nvme_tcp_has_inline_data(req);
> u8 hdgst = nvme_tcp_hdgst_len(queue);
> int len = sizeof(*pdu) + hdgst - req->offset;
> + struct request *rq = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(req);
> int flags = MSG_DONTWAIT;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -1136,6 +1265,10 @@ static int nvme_tcp_try_send_cmd_pdu(struct nvme_tcp_request *req)
> else
> flags |= MSG_EOR;
>
> + if (test_bit(NVME_TCP_Q_OFF_DDP, &queue->flags) &&
> + blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq) && rq_data_dir(rq) == READ)
> + nvme_tcp_setup_ddp(queue, pdu->cmd.common.command_id, rq);
> +
For consistency, shouldn't this be wrapped in the CONFIG_TCP_DDP check too?
> if (queue->hdr_digest && !req->offset)
> nvme_tcp_hdgst(queue->snd_hash, pdu, sizeof(*pdu));
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists