netdev - Re: [EXT] re: octeontx2-af: cn10k: MAC internal loopback support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Feb 2021 18:01:24 +0000
From:   Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>
To:     Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
CC:     Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>,
        Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>,
        Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@...vell.com>,
        Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] re: octeontx2-af: cn10k: MAC internal loopback support

Hi Colin,

I have submitted the patch fixing the reported issue to net-next branch.

Thank you,
Geetha.

________________________________________
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2021 10:22 PM
To: Hariprasad Kelam
Cc: Sunil Kovvuri Goutham; Linu Cherian; Geethasowjanya Akula; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran; Hariprasad Kelam; Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [EXT] re: octeontx2-af: cn10k: MAC internal loopback support

External Email

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi,

Static analysis on linux-next today using Coverity found an issue in the
following commit:

commit 3ad3f8f93c81f81d6e28b2e286b03669cc1fb3b0
Author: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com>
Date:   Thu Feb 11 21:28:34 2021 +0530

    octeontx2-af: cn10k: MAC internal loopback support

The analysis is as follows:

723 static int rvu_cgx_config_intlbk(struct rvu *rvu, u16 pcifunc, bool en)
724 {
725        struct mac_ops *mac_ops;

   1. var_decl: Declaring variable lmac_id without initializer.

726        u8 cgx_id, lmac_id;
727

   2. Condition !is_cgx_config_permitted(rvu, pcifunc), taking false branch.

728        if (!is_cgx_config_permitted(rvu, pcifunc))
729                return -EPERM;
730

    Uninitialized scalar variable (UNINIT)

731        mac_ops = get_mac_ops(rvu_cgx_pdata(cgx_id, rvu));
732

   Uninitialized scalar variable (UNINIT)
   3. uninit_use_in_call: Using uninitialized value lmac_id when calling
*mac_ops->mac_lmac_intl_lbk.

733        return mac_ops->mac_lmac_intl_lbk(rvu_cgx_pdata(cgx_id, rvu),
734                                          lmac_id, en);
735 }

Variables cgx_id and lmac_id are no longer being initialized and garbage
values are being passed into function calls.  Originally, these
variables were being initialized with a call to rvu_get_cgx_lmac_id()
but that has now been removed.

Colin