netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:35:37 +0100
From:   Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>
To:     Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

On Mon, 2021-02-15 at 12:01 +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> Before these commits, ALL_TESTS listed the tests in the order they were
> implemented in the rest of the file. So I'd rather continue following
> this implicit rule, if at all possible. Also it makes sense to keep
> grouping all match_ip_*_test together.

yes, it makes sense. I can follow-up with a commit for net-next (when
tree re-opens), where the "ordering" in ALL_TESTS is restored. Ok?

thanks,
-- 
davide