netdev - epoll: different edge-triggered behavior bewteen pipe and socketpair

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210216193911.88C9795C05D0@us180.sjc.aristanetworks.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Feb 2021 11:39:11 -0800
From:   fruggeri@...sta.com (Francesco Ruggeri)
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, fruggeri@...sta.com
Subject: epoll: different edge-triggered behavior bewteen pipe and
 socketpair

pipe() and socketpair() have different behavior wrt edge-triggered
read epoll, in that no event is generated when data is written into
a non-empty pipe, but an event is generated if socketpair() is used
instead.
This simple modification of the epoll2 testlet from 
tools/testing/selftests/filesystems/epoll/epoll_wakeup_test.c
(it just adds a second write) shows the different behavior.
The testlet passes with pipe() but fails with socketpair() with 5.10.
They both fail with 4.19.
Is it fair to assume that 5.10 pipe's behavior is the correct one?

Thanks,
Francesco Ruggeri

/*
 *          t0
 *           | (ew)
 *          e0
 *           | (et)
 *          s0
 */
TEST(epoll2)
{
	int efd;
	int sfd[2];
	struct epoll_event e;

	ASSERT_EQ(socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sfd), 0);
	//ASSERT_EQ(pipe(sfd), 0);

	efd = epoll_create(1);
	ASSERT_GE(efd, 0);

	e.events = EPOLLIN | EPOLLET;
	ASSERT_EQ(epoll_ctl(efd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, sfd[0], &e), 0);

	ASSERT_EQ(write(sfd[1], "w", 1), 1);
	EXPECT_EQ(epoll_wait(efd, &e, 1, 0), 1);

	ASSERT_EQ(write(sfd[1], "w", 1), 1);
	EXPECT_EQ(epoll_wait(efd, &e, 1, 0), 0);

	close(efd);
	close(sfd[0]);
	close(sfd[1]);
}