netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] fix coding style in driver/staging/qlge/qlge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YCt5cYeS0sZjS2V+@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:51:13 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Du Cheng <ducheng2@...il.com>
Cc:     Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fix coding style in driver/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 03:35:26PM +0800, Du Cheng wrote:
> align * in block comments on each line
> 
> Signed-off-by: Du Cheng <ducheng2@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c
> index 5516be3af898..2682a0e474bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/qlge/qlge_main.c
> @@ -3815,8 +3815,7 @@ static int qlge_adapter_down(struct qlge_adapter *qdev)
>  
>  	qlge_tx_ring_clean(qdev);
>  
> -	/* Call netif_napi_del() from common point.
> -	*/
> +	/* Call netif_napi_del() from common point. */
>  	for (i = 0; i < qdev->rss_ring_count; i++)
>  		netif_napi_del(&qdev->rx_ring[i].napi);
>  
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg,
  and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about.  Please read
  the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what a proper Subject: line should
  look like.

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
  did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
  Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
  kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what needs to be done
  here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot