[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YC1ztKr/bpmc71Xh@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:51:16 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Wenzel, Marco" <Marco.Wenzel@...berle.de>
Cc: George McCollister <george.mccollister@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: HSR/PRP sequence counter issue with Cisco Redbox
> From 8836f1df35a884327da37885ff3ad8bfc5eb933c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Marco Wenzel <marco.wenzel@...berle.de>
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2021 13:53:31 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] net: hsr: add support for EntryForgetTime
>
> In IEC 62439-3 EntryForgetTime is defined with a value of 400 ms. When a
> node does not send any frame within this time, the sequence number check
> for can be ignored. This solves communication issues with Cisco IE 2000
> in Redbox mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Wenzel <marco.wenzel@...berle.de>
It would be nice to have a Fixes: tag here to indicate which commit
introduced the problem. If it has been broken forever, reference the
commit which added HSR.
> diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h b/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h
> index 86b43f539f2c..7a120ce3e3db 100644
> --- a/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h
> +++ b/net/hsr/hsr_framereg.h
> @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ struct hsr_node {
> enum hsr_port_type addr_B_port;
> unsigned long time_in[HSR_PT_PORTS];
> bool time_in_stale[HSR_PT_PORTS];
> + unsigned long time_out[HSR_PT_PORTS];
It looks like the indentation is wrong here, and is using a mixture of
tabs and spaces.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists