netdev - Re: [RFC net-next 1/2] net: dsa: add Realtek RTL8366S switch tag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALW65jastCPRmJ3EixttJatL2nC-D3GmSdN3J8wbpgkeM7ELVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:28:03 +0800
From:   DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@...lfence.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/2] net: dsa: add Realtek RTL8366S switch tag

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 6:55 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> I suppose this switch can just use the existing RTL4 A tag
> code after the recent patch so this one is not needed?

No. Different protocol (0x9 instead of 0xA) and different xmit tag
format (port bit mask instead of port number).
Please take a closer look.

>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij