lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWMa61VhVk00cAwKFZ3KNUv6o8kvniNYT3EKWkNQxnExQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:32:09 -0800
From:   Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:     Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
        Dongdong Wang <wangdongdong.6@...edance.com>,
        Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@...edance.com>,
        Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch bpf-next v6 5/8] sock_map: rename skb_parser and skb_verdict

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:28 AM Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com> wrote:
>
> skb_parser also appears in:
>
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c:int txmsg_omit_skb_parser;
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c:     {"txmsg_omit_skb_parser", no_argument,      &txmsg_omit_skb_parser, 1},
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c:     txmsg_omit_skb_parser = 0;
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c:     if (!txmsg_omit_skb_parser) {
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c:             if (!txmsg_omit_skb_parser) {
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c:     /* Tests that omit skb_parser */
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c:     txmsg_omit_skb_parser = 1;
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c:     txmsg_omit_skb_parser = 0;

These are harmless, because they are internal variables of a self test.
So, I prefer to just leave them as they are.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ