[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+FuTSc0FRPJZubXrvojzNP9MvTp3rfJeH2zOQbETCNV80oOcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:25:36 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Gong, Sishuai" <sishuai@...due.edu>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org" <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
"dsahern@...nel.org" <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Data race on dev->mtu betwen __dev_set_mtu() and rawv6_send_hdrinc()
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 6:30 PM Gong, Sishuai <sishuai@...due.edu> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We found a data race on dev->mtu between function __dev_set_mtu() and rawv6_send_hdrinc(). It happens with the following interleaving.
>
> writer: __dev_set_mtu() reader: rawv6_send_hdrinc()
> if (length > rt->dst.dev->mtu) {
> WRITE_ONCE(dev->mtu, new_mtu);
> ipv6_local_error(sk, EMSGSIZE, fl6, rt->dst.dev->mtu);
>
> If the writer happens to change dev->mtu to a value that is bigger than the variable ‘length’, then ipv6_local_error will read a value that doesn’t satisfy this conditional statement. While there is no need to use lock to protect the read, it is probably better to only read dev->mtu once in rawv6_send_hdrinc().
Makes sense. The same would then apply to raw_send_hdrinc().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists