[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWofNM=erfyP8b_qrezJN6d51UDW5bfgo2LHkPOTXqm8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:04:49 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
Dongdong Wang <wangdongdong.6@...edance.com>,
Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@...edance.com>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch bpf-next v6 4/8] skmsg: move sk_redir from TCP_SKB_CB to skb
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:53 AM Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com> wrote:
> Based on what I've seen around, mask for sanitizing tagged pointers is
> usually derived from the flag(s). For instance:
>
> #define SKB_DST_NOREF 1UL
> #define SKB_DST_PTRMASK ~(SKB_DST_NOREF)
>
> #define SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY 1UL
> #define SK_USER_DATA_BPF 2UL /* Managed by BPF */
> #define SK_USER_DATA_PTRMASK ~(SK_USER_DATA_NOCOPY | SK_USER_DATA_BPF)
>
> Using ~(BPF_F_INGRESS) expression would be like substituting mask
> definition.
Yes, that is why I said we need a mask.
>
> Alternatively we could clear _skb_refdest after clone, but before
> enqueuing the skb in ingress_skb. And only for when we're redirecting.
>
> I believe that would be in sk_psock_skb_redirect, right before skb_queue_tail.
Hmm? We definitely cannot clear skb->_sk_redir there, as it is used after
enqueued in ingress_skb, that is in sk_psock_backlog().
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists