lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210223123052.1b27aad1@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Feb 2021 12:30:52 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     menglong8.dong@...il.com
Cc:     andy.shevchenko@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, axboe@...nel.dk,
        herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        dong.menglong@....com.cn, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next] net: socket: use BIT() for MSG_*

On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 14:54:27 +0800 menglong8.dong@...il.com wrote:
> From: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>
> 
> The bit mask for MSG_* seems a little confused here. Replace it
> with BIT() to make it clear to understand.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>

# Form letter - net-next is closed

We have already sent the networking pull request for 5.12 and therefore
net-next is closed for new drivers, features, code refactoring and
optimizations. We are currently accepting bug fixes only.

Please repost when net-next reopens after 5.12-rc1 is cut.

Look out for the announcement on the mailing list or check:
http://vger.kernel.org/~davem/net-next.html

RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ