[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACAyw98gTrzf8+cPnBEC5A3_rg70UUrJxtV9a_w-dMpKn0Wicg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 10:12:49 +0000
From: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...udflare.com>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/8] PROG_TEST_RUN support for sk_lookup programs
On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 at 07:29, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Curious, is there any supported architecture where this is not the
> case? I think it's fine to be consistent, tbh, and use int. Worst
> case, in some obscure architecture we'd need to create a copy of an
> array. Doesn't seem like a big deal (and highly unlikely anyways).
Ok, thanks! I'm not super familiar with C platform differences, so I wanted
to be on the safe side. I'll take this up depending on the outcome of the
conversation with Alexey, maybe I don't need to add this after all.
--
Lorenz Bauer | Systems Engineer
6th Floor, County Hall/The Riverside Building, SE1 7PB, UK
www.cloudflare.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists