[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76ec5c10-c051-7a52-9ae7-04af79a0e9e5@hartkopp.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:32:29 +0100
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>,
Andre Naujoks <nautsch2@...il.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/1] can: can_skb_set_owner(): fix ref counting if
socket was closed before setting skb ownership
On 24.02.21 09:53, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 8:59 AM Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> There are two ref count variables controlling the free()ing of a socket:
>> - struct sock::sk_refcnt - which is changed by sock_hold()/sock_put()
>> - struct sock::sk_wmem_alloc - which accounts the memory allocated by
>> the skbs in the send path.
>>
>> In case there are still TX skbs on the fly and the socket() is closed,
>> the struct sock::sk_refcnt reaches 0. In the TX-path the CAN stack
>> clones an "echo" skb, calls sock_hold() on the original socket and
>> references it. This produces the following back trace:
>>
>> | WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 280 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0x114/0x134
>> | refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
>> | Modules linked in: coda_vpu(E) v4l2_jpeg(E) videobuf2_vmalloc(E) imx_vdoa(E)
>> | CPU: 0 PID: 280 Comm: test_can.sh Tainted: G E 5.11.0-04577-gf8ff6603c617 #203
>> | Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree)
>> | Backtrace:
>> | [<80bafea4>] (dump_backtrace) from [<80bb0280>] (show_stack+0x20/0x24) r7:00000000 r6:600f0113 r5:00000000 r4:81441220
>> | [<80bb0260>] (show_stack) from [<80bb593c>] (dump_stack+0xa0/0xc8)
>> | [<80bb589c>] (dump_stack) from [<8012b268>] (__warn+0xd4/0x114) r9:00000019 r8:80f4a8c2 r7:83e4150c r6:00000000 r5:00000009 r4:80528f90
>> | [<8012b194>] (__warn) from [<80bb09c4>] (warn_slowpath_fmt+0x88/0xc8) r9:83f26400 r8:80f4a8d1 r7:00000009 r6:80528f90 r5:00000019 r4:80f4a8c2
>> | [<80bb0940>] (warn_slowpath_fmt) from [<80528f90>] (refcount_warn_saturate+0x114/0x134) r8:00000000 r7:00000000 r6:82b44000 r5:834e5600 r4:83f4d540
>> | [<80528e7c>] (refcount_warn_saturate) from [<8079a4c8>] (__refcount_add.constprop.0+0x4c/0x50)
>> | [<8079a47c>] (__refcount_add.constprop.0) from [<8079a57c>] (can_put_echo_skb+0xb0/0x13c)
>> | [<8079a4cc>] (can_put_echo_skb) from [<8079ba98>] (flexcan_start_xmit+0x1c4/0x230) r9:00000010 r8:83f48610 r7:0fdc0000 r6:0c080000 r5:82b44000 r4:834e5600
>> | [<8079b8d4>] (flexcan_start_xmit) from [<80969078>] (netdev_start_xmit+0x44/0x70) r9:814c0ba0 r8:80c8790c r7:00000000 r6:834e5600 r5:82b44000 r4:82ab1f00
>> | [<80969034>] (netdev_start_xmit) from [<809725a4>] (dev_hard_start_xmit+0x19c/0x318) r9:814c0ba0 r8:00000000 r7:82ab1f00 r6:82b44000 r5:00000000 r4:834e5600
>> | [<80972408>] (dev_hard_start_xmit) from [<809c6584>] (sch_direct_xmit+0xcc/0x264) r10:834e5600 r9:00000000 r8:00000000 r7:82b44000 r6:82ab1f00 r5:834e5600 r4:83f27400
>> | [<809c64b8>] (sch_direct_xmit) from [<809c6c0c>] (__qdisc_run+0x4f0/0x534)
>>
>> To fix this problem, only set skb ownership to sockets which have still
>> a ref count > 0.
>>
>> Cc: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
>> Cc: Andre Naujoks <nautsch2@...il.com>
>> Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>> Fixes: 0ae89beb283a ("can: add destructor for self generated skbs")
>> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
>
> SGTM
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
>> ---
>> include/linux/can/skb.h | 3 +--
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/can/skb.h b/include/linux/can/skb.h
>> index 685f34cfba20..655f33aa99e3 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/can/skb.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/can/skb.h
>> @@ -65,8 +65,7 @@ static inline void can_skb_reserve(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>
>> static inline void can_skb_set_owner(struct sk_buff *skb, struct sock *sk)
>> {
>> - if (sk) {
>> - sock_hold(sk);
Although the commit message gives a comprehensive reason for this patch:
Can you please add some comment here as I do not think the use of
refcount_inc_not_zero() makes clear what is checked here.
Many thanks,
Oliver
>> + if (sk && refcount_inc_not_zero(&sk->sk_refcnt)) {
>> skb->destructor = sock_efree;
>> skb->sk = sk;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.29.2
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists