[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210225125102.23989-1-simon.horman@netronome.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 13:51:02 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>,
Louis Peens <louis.peens@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v2] ethtool: fix the check logic of at least one channel for RX/TX
From: Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>
The command "ethtool -L <intf> combined 0" may clean the RX/TX channel
count and skip the error path, since the attrs
tb[ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_RX_COUNT] and tb[ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_TX_COUNT]
are NULL in this case when recent ethtool is used.
Tested using ethtool v5.10.
Fixes: 7be92514b99c ("ethtool: check if there is at least one channel for TX/RX in the core")
Signed-off-by: Yinjun Zhang <yinjun.zhang@...igine.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Louis Peens <louis.peens@...ronome.com>
---
V2: (suggested by Jakub Kicinski)
- A better change to fix the check of exceeding max count as well
---
net/ethtool/channels.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ethtool/channels.c b/net/ethtool/channels.c
index 25a9e566ef5c..6a070dc8e4b0 100644
--- a/net/ethtool/channels.c
+++ b/net/ethtool/channels.c
@@ -116,10 +116,9 @@ int ethnl_set_channels(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
struct ethtool_channels channels = {};
struct ethnl_req_info req_info = {};
struct nlattr **tb = info->attrs;
- const struct nlattr *err_attr;
+ u32 err_attr, max_rx_in_use = 0;
const struct ethtool_ops *ops;
struct net_device *dev;
- u32 max_rx_in_use = 0;
int ret;
ret = ethnl_parse_header_dev_get(&req_info,
@@ -157,34 +156,35 @@ int ethnl_set_channels(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
/* ensure new channel counts are within limits */
if (channels.rx_count > channels.max_rx)
- err_attr = tb[ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_RX_COUNT];
+ err_attr = ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_RX_COUNT;
else if (channels.tx_count > channels.max_tx)
- err_attr = tb[ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_TX_COUNT];
+ err_attr = ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_TX_COUNT;
else if (channels.other_count > channels.max_other)
- err_attr = tb[ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_OTHER_COUNT];
+ err_attr = ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_OTHER_COUNT;
else if (channels.combined_count > channels.max_combined)
- err_attr = tb[ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_COMBINED_COUNT];
+ err_attr = ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_COMBINED_COUNT;
else
- err_attr = NULL;
+ err_attr = 0;
if (err_attr) {
ret = -EINVAL;
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, err_attr,
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, tb[err_attr],
"requested channel count exceeds maximum");
goto out_ops;
}
/* ensure there is at least one RX and one TX channel */
if (!channels.combined_count && !channels.rx_count)
- err_attr = tb[ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_RX_COUNT];
+ err_attr = ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_RX_COUNT;
else if (!channels.combined_count && !channels.tx_count)
- err_attr = tb[ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_TX_COUNT];
+ err_attr = ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_TX_COUNT;
else
- err_attr = NULL;
+ err_attr = 0;
if (err_attr) {
if (mod_combined)
- err_attr = tb[ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_COMBINED_COUNT];
+ err_attr = ETHTOOL_A_CHANNELS_COMBINED_COUNT;
ret = -EINVAL;
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, err_attr, "requested channel counts would result in no RX or TX channel being configured");
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_ATTR(info->extack, tb[err_attr],
+ "requested channel counts would result in no RX or TX channel being configured");
goto out_ops;
}
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists