[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <866808f2-d6aa-f887-a11d-8d9ec741188d@ieee.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:29:16 -0600
From: Alex Elder <elder@...e.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Sharath Chandra Vurukala <sharathv@...eaurora.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, elder@...nel.org, cpratapa@...eaurora.org,
subashab@...eaurora.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/3] net: ethernet: rmnet: Support for
downlink MAPv5 checksum offload
On 2/24/21 12:23 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 01:32:50 +0530 Sharath Chandra Vurukala wrote:
>> +/* MAP CSUM headers */
>> +struct rmnet_map_v5_csum_header {
>> +#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
>> + u8 next_hdr:1;
>> + u8 header_type:7;
>> + u8 hw_reserved:7;
>> + u8 csum_valid_required:1;
>> +#elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN_BITFIELD)
>> + u8 header_type:7;
>> + u8 next_hdr:1;
>> + u8 csum_valid_required:1;
>> + u8 hw_reserved:7;
>> +#else
>> +#error "Please fix <asm/byteorder.h>"
>> +#endif
>> + __be16 reserved;
>> +} __aligned(1);
>
> This seems to be your first contribution so let me spell it out.
>
> In Linux when maintainers ask you to do something you are expected
> to do it.
>
> You can leave the existing bitfields for later, but don't add another.
As I offered, I will implement changes to the existing
code to use masks in place of these C bit-fields.
I will try complete this within the next week. If it
looks good it could serve as an example of how to go
about it.
-Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists