netdev - RE: [External] Re: High (200+) XFRM interface count performance problem (throughput)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <978dc613e5374ae19e13a5d920079c07@skoda.cz>
Date:   Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:28:28 +0000
From:   Vinš Karel <karel.vins@...da.cz>
To:     'Eyal Birger' <eyal.birger@...il.com>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [External] Re: High (200+) XFRM interface count performance
 problem (throughput)

Hi Eyal,
with kernel 5.10 it work very well. Tested with 10 000 interfaces. Thank you once more.

Regards, Karel

-----Original Message-----
From: Vinš Karel <karel.vins@...da.cz> 
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 12:02 PM
To: 'Eyal Birger' <eyal.birger@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [External] RE: [External] Re: High (200+) XFRM interface count performance problem (throughput)

.

Hi Eyal, thank you for response. I found that commit with your comment during the night. I will test it.
Do you think that there is a chance to backport this to 5.4 as it is LTS kernel?

Regards,

Karel

-----Original Message-----
From: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 9:15 AM
To: Vinš Karel <karel.vins@...da.cz>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [External] Re: High (200+) XFRM interface count performance problem (throughput)

.

Hi Vinš,

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:52 PM Vinš Karel <karel.vins@...da.cz> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask you for help or advise.
>
> I'm testing setup with higher number of XFRM interfaces and I'm facing throughput degradation with a growing number of created XFRM interfaces - not concurrent tunnels established but only XFRM interfaces created - even in DOWN state.
> Issue is only unidirectional - from "client" to "vpn hub". Throughput for traffic from hub to client is not affected.
>
> XFRM interface created with:
> for i in {1..500}; do link add ipsec$i type xfrm dev ens224 if_id $i ; 
> done
>
> I'm testing with iperf3 with 1 client connected - from client to hub:
> 2 interfaces - 1.36 Gbps
> 100 interfaces - 1.35 Gbps
> 200 interfaces - 1.19 Gbps
> 300 interfaces - 0.98 Gbps
> 500 interfaces - 0.71 Gbps
>
> Throughput from hub to client is around 1.4 Gbps in all cases.
>
> 1 CPU core is 100%
>
> Linux v-hub 5.4.0-65-generic #73-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jan 18 17:25:17 UTC
> 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Can you please try with a higher kernel version (>= 5.9)?
We've done some work to improve xfrm interface scaling specifically e98e44562ba2 ("xfrm interface: store xfrmi contexts in a hash by if_id").

Thanks,
Eyal.