lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4910425-82ae-b1ce-68c3-fb5542f598a5@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:04:02 +0100
From:   Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...il.com>,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, hawk@...nel.org,
        magnus.karlsson@...el.com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/2] bpf, xdp: make bpf_redirect_map() a map
 operation


On 2021-02-26 12:40, Björn Töpel wrote:
> On 2021-02-26 12:37, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:

[...]

>>
>> (That last paragraph above is why I asked if you updated the performance
>> numbers in the cover letter; removing an additional function call should
>> affect those, right?)
>>
> 
> Yeah, it should. Let me spend some more time benchmarking on the DEVMAP
> scenario.
>

I did a re-measure using samples/xdp_redirect_map.

The setup is 64B packets blasted to an i40e. As a baseline,

   # xdp_rxq_info --dev ens801f1 --action XDP_DROP

gives 24.8 Mpps.


Now, xdp_redirect_map. Same NIC, two ports, receive from port A,
redirect to port B:

baseline:    14.3 Mpps
this series: 15.4 Mpps

which is almost 8%!


Björn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ