netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YDyllv3zs+lWtgCV@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 1 Mar 2021 09:28:06 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, kvalo@...eaurora.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] lockdep: add lockdep_assert_not_held()

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 02:16:12PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 2/26/21 2:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:52:13AM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > +		/* avoid false negative lockdep_assert_not_held()
> > > +		 * and lockdep_assert_held()
> > > +		 */
> > 
> > That's a coding style fail.
> > 
> 
> Checkpatch didn't complain.

  Documentation/CodingStyle

(or whatever unreadable rst crap it is today :-( )

and:

  https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFyQYJerovMsSoSKS7PessZBr4vNp-3QUUwhqk4A4_jcbg@mail.gmail.com/

> What's your preference? Does the following work for you?
> 
> /*
>  * avoid false negative lockdep_assert_not_held()
>  * and lockdep_assert_held()
>  */

Yep (ideally even with a Capital and full stop).