[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 20:27:04 -0800
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...udflare.com>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/5] bpf: consolidate shared test timing code
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 2:19 AM Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com> wrote:
>
> Share the timing / signal interruption logic between different
> implementations of PROG_TEST_RUN. There is a change in behaviour
> as well. We check the loop exit condition before checking for
> pending signals. This resolves an edge case where a signal
> arrives during the last iteration. Instead of aborting with
> EINTR we return the successful result to user space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
> ---
> net/bpf/test_run.c | 141 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> index 58bcb8c849d5..ac8ee36d60cc 100644
> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> @@ -16,14 +16,78 @@
> #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
> #include <trace/events/bpf_test_run.h>
>
> +struct test_timer {
nit: super generic name, I'd add bpf_ prefix throughout
(bpf_test_timer, bpf_test_timer_enter, bpf_test_timer_leave, and so
on)
> + enum { NO_PREEMPT, NO_MIGRATE } mode;
> + u32 i;
> + u64 time_start, time_spent;
> +};
> +
[...]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists