[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 17:06:27 +0000
From: Tom Cook <tom.k.cook@...il.com>
To: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MACSEC configuration - is CONFIG_MACSEC enough?
Never mind, I found commit b3bdc3acbb44d74d0b7ba4d97169577a2b46dc88
that fixed this in 4.10-rc9 or so. Sorry for wasting your time.
Regards,
Tom Cook
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 3:00 PM Tom Cook <tom.k.cook@...il.com> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to use MACSEC on an arm64 embedded platform; I'm trying to
> create an encrypted channel between two of them rather than doing
> switch port access etc. The vendor's BSP only provides a 4.9 kernel
> so that's what I'm using. I've added CONFIG_MACSEC=y to the kernel
> config. This then forces CONFIG_CRYPTO_GCM=y and CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES=y.
>
> I've tried both manual configuration of MACSEC interfaces and also
> using wpa_supplicant to do MKA negotiation. I then add IP addresses
> to the MACSEC interfaces in the 192.168.149.0/24 subnet. In both
> cases, the result is that the macsec0 interface has flags
> BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP but is in the UNKNOWN state.
> Attempting to ping from one to the other results in encrypted ARP
> frames being transmitted but then discarded at the receiver end.
> tcpdump shows the frames arriving at the receiver and `ip -s macsec
> show` shows these frames being added to the InPktsNotValid counter.
>
> AFAICT from macsec.c, InPktsNotValid means either that the decryption
> failed or that memory allocation for the decryption failed.
>
> Is there some other bit of kernel config I need to do to get the
> decryption to work correctly?
>
> The SOC is a cavium cn8030. This part is equipped with a crypto
> accelerator but support for it is not compiled into the kernel.
>
> Thanks for any help,
> Tom Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists