[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210304105654.873554-2-olteanv@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:56:54 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: [PATCH net 2/2] net: dsa: sja1105: fix ucast/bcast flooding always remaining enabled
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
In the blamed patch I managed to introduce a bug while moving code
around: the same logic is applied to the ucast_egress_floods and
bcast_egress_floods variables both on the "if" and the "else" branches.
This is clearly an unintended change compared to how the code used to be
prior to that bugfix, so restore it.
Fixes: 7f7ccdea8c73 ("net: dsa: sja1105: fix leakage of flooded frames outside bridging domain")
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
index c1982615c631..51ea104c63bb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
@@ -3369,14 +3369,14 @@ static int sja1105_port_ucast_bcast_flood(struct sja1105_private *priv, int to,
if (flags.val & BR_FLOOD)
priv->ucast_egress_floods |= BIT(to);
else
- priv->ucast_egress_floods |= BIT(to);
+ priv->ucast_egress_floods &= ~BIT(to);
}
if (flags.mask & BR_BCAST_FLOOD) {
if (flags.val & BR_BCAST_FLOOD)
priv->bcast_egress_floods |= BIT(to);
else
- priv->bcast_egress_floods |= BIT(to);
+ priv->bcast_egress_floods &= ~BIT(to);
}
return sja1105_manage_flood_domains(priv);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists