netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/5] selftests: bpf: don't run sk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210303101816.36774-6-lmb@cloudflare.com>
Date:   Wed,  3 Mar 2021 10:18:16 +0000
From:   Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
To:     ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org
Cc:     kernel-team@...udflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/5] selftests: bpf: don't run sk_lookup in verifier tests

sk_lookup doesn't allow setting data_in for bpf_prog_run. This doesn't
play well with the verifier tests, since they always set a 64 byte
input buffer. Allow not running verifier tests by setting
bpf_test.runs to a negative value and don't run the ctx access case
for sk_lookup. We have dedicated ctx access tests so skipping here
doesn't reduce coverage.

Signed-off-by: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c          | 4 ++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 58b5a349d3ba..1512092e1e68 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ struct bpf_test {
 	enum bpf_prog_type prog_type;
 	uint8_t flags;
 	void (*fill_helper)(struct bpf_test *self);
-	uint8_t runs;
+	int runs;
 #define bpf_testdata_struct_t					\
 	struct {						\
 		uint32_t retval, retval_unpriv;			\
@@ -1165,7 +1165,7 @@ static void do_test_single(struct bpf_test *test, bool unpriv,
 
 	run_errs = 0;
 	run_successes = 0;
-	if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0) {
+	if (!alignment_prevented_execution && fd_prog >= 0 && test->runs >= 0) {
 		uint32_t expected_val;
 		int i;
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
index fb13ca2d5606..d78627be060f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
@@ -239,6 +239,7 @@
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
 	.expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+	.runs = -1,
 },
 /* invalid 8-byte reads from a 4-byte fields in bpf_sk_lookup */
 {
-- 
2.27.0