[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iKx141w0c+eQq-vXjJRfrnDD=yo8uBvfBJ11xaiV9kj_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:53:59 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin Zaharinov <micron10@...il.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: fix race between napi kthread mode and busy poll
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 2:21 AM Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, napi_thread_wait() checks for NAPI_STATE_SCHED bit to
> determine if the kthread owns this napi and could call napi->poll() on
> it. However, if socket busy poll is enabled, it is possible that the
> busy poll thread grabs this SCHED bit (after the previous napi->poll()
> invokes napi_complete_done() and clears SCHED bit) and tries to poll
> on the same napi. napi_disable() could grab the SCHED bit as well.
> This patch tries to fix this race by adding a new bit
> NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED in napi->state. This bit gets set in
> ____napi_schedule() if the threaded mode is enabled, and gets cleared
> in napi_complete_done(), and we only poll the napi in kthread if this
> bit is set. This helps distinguish the ownership of the napi between
> kthread and other scenarios and fixes the race issue.
>
> Fixes: 29863d41bb6e ("net: implement threaded-able napi poll loop support")
> Reported-by: Martin Zaharinov <micron10@...il.com>
> Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <weiwan@...gle.com>
> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
> ---
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 2 ++
> net/core/dev.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index ddf4cfc12615..682908707c1a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -360,6 +360,7 @@ enum {
> NAPI_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL, /* sk_busy_loop() owns this NAPI */
> NAPI_STATE_PREFER_BUSY_POLL, /* prefer busy-polling over softirq processing*/
> NAPI_STATE_THREADED, /* The poll is performed inside its own thread*/
> + NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED, /* Napi is currently scheduled in threaded mode */
> };
>
> enum {
> @@ -372,6 +373,7 @@ enum {
> NAPIF_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL = BIT(NAPI_STATE_IN_BUSY_POLL),
> NAPIF_STATE_PREFER_BUSY_POLL = BIT(NAPI_STATE_PREFER_BUSY_POLL),
> NAPIF_STATE_THREADED = BIT(NAPI_STATE_THREADED),
> + NAPIF_STATE_SCHED_THREADED = BIT(NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED),
> };
>
> enum gro_result {
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 6c5967e80132..03c4763de351 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -4294,6 +4294,8 @@ static inline void ____napi_schedule(struct softnet_data *sd,
> */
> thread = READ_ONCE(napi->thread);
> if (thread) {
> + if (thread->state != TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
How safe is this read ?
Presumably KMSAN will detect that another cpu/thread is able to change
thread->state under us,
so a READ_ONCE() (or data_race()) would be needed.
Nowhere else in the kernel can we find a similar construct, I find
unfortunate to bury
in net/core/dev.c something that might be incorrect in the future.
> + set_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED, &napi->state);
> wake_up_process(thread);
> return;
> }
> @@ -6486,6 +6488,7 @@ bool napi_complete_done(struct napi_struct *n, int work_done)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!(val & NAPIF_STATE_SCHED));
>
> new = val & ~(NAPIF_STATE_MISSED | NAPIF_STATE_SCHED |
> + NAPIF_STATE_SCHED_THREADED |
> NAPIF_STATE_PREFER_BUSY_POLL);
>
> /* If STATE_MISSED was set, leave STATE_SCHED set,
> @@ -6968,16 +6971,25 @@ static int napi_poll(struct napi_struct *n, struct list_head *repoll)
>
> static int napi_thread_wait(struct napi_struct *napi)
> {
> + bool woken = false;
> +
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>
> while (!kthread_should_stop() && !napi_disable_pending(napi)) {
> - if (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &napi->state)) {
> + /* Testing SCHED_THREADED bit here to make sure the current
> + * kthread owns this napi and could poll on this napi.
> + * Testing SCHED bit is not enough because SCHED bit might be
> + * set by some other busy poll thread or by napi_disable().
> + */
> + if (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED_THREADED, &napi->state) || woken) {
> WARN_ON(!list_empty(&napi->poll_list));
> __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> return 0;
> }
>
> schedule();
> + /* woken being true indicates this thread owns this napi. */
> + woken = true;
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> }
> __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> --
> 2.30.1.766.gb4fecdf3b7-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists