lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACAyw98WfDE5HKP8NDHa5V2JzzXUyuWHnfnXNRUgxGvktZ5VBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Mar 2021 10:20:28 +0000
From:   Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com>
To:     Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:     Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
        Dongdong Wang <wangdongdong.6@...edance.com>,
        Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@...edance.com>,
        Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch bpf-next v2 9/9] selftests/bpf: add a test case for udp sockmap

On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 18:05, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 8:32 AM Lorenz Bauer <lmb@...udflare.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 02:38, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
> > >
> > > Add a test case to ensure redirection between two UDP sockets work.
> >
> > I basically don't understand how splicing works, but watching from the
> > sidelines makes me think it'd be good to have more thorough tests.
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sockmap.c has quite elaborate tests
> > for the TCP part, it'd be nice to get similar tests going for UDP. For
>
> Sure, TCP supports more than just BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT, hence
> why it must have more tests than UDP. ;)
>
> > example:
> >
> > * sendfile?
> > * sendmmsg
>
> Does UDP support any of these? I don't think so, at least not in my
> patchset.

I have no idea, thanks for checking :)

>
> > * Something Jakub mentioned: what happens when a connected, spliced
> > socket is disconnected via connect(AF_UNSPEC)? Seems like we don't
> > hook sk_prot->disconnect anywhere.
>
> But we hook ->unhash(), right?

I wasn't aware that ->disconnect calls unhash, thanks!

-- 
Lorenz Bauer  |  Systems Engineer
6th Floor, County Hall/The Riverside Building, SE1 7PB, UK

www.cloudflare.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ