[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a988a651-1233-0ac3-7018-4ea24096f167@embeddedor.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 10:49:55 -0600
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND][next] rtl8xxxu: Fix fall-through warnings for
Clang
On 3/5/21 07:40, Kalle Valo wrote:
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org> writes:
>
>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
>> multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments with
>> the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the
>> code fall through to the next case.
>>
>> Notice that Clang doesn't recognize /* fall through */ comments as
>> implicit fall-through markings.
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
>
> It's not cool that you ignore the comments you got in [1], then after a
> while mark the patch as "RESEND" and not even include a changelog why it
> was resent.
I'm a bit confused. I replied to the same thread at the time. You can see
my response there. No one replied back. :/
--
Gustavo
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/d522f387b2d0dde774785c7169c1f25aa529989d.1605896060.git.gustavoars@kernel.org/
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists