netdev - Re: [PATCH wpan 04/17] net: ieee802154: forbid monitor for set llsec params

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 6 Mar 2021 08:12:11 -0500
From:   Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
To:     Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>
Cc:     Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>,
        linux-wpan - ML <linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:NETWORKING [GENERAL]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wpan 04/17] net: ieee802154: forbid monitor for set llsec params

Hi,

On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 02:28, Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org> wrote:
>
> Hello Alex.
>
> On 28.02.21 16:18, Alexander Aring wrote:
> > This patch forbids to set llsec params for monitor interfaces which we
> > don't support yet.
> >
> > Reported-by: syzbot+8b6719da8a04beeafcc3@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >   net/ieee802154/nl802154.c | 3 +++
> >   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/ieee802154/nl802154.c b/net/ieee802154/nl802154.c
> > index 3ee09f6d13b7..67f0dc622bc2 100644
> > --- a/net/ieee802154/nl802154.c
> > +++ b/net/ieee802154/nl802154.c
> > @@ -1384,6 +1384,9 @@ static int nl802154_set_llsec_params(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >       u32 changed = 0;
> >       int ret;
> >
> > +     if (wpan_dev->iftype == NL802154_IFTYPE_MONITOR)
> > +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> >       if (info->attrs[NL802154_ATTR_SEC_ENABLED]) {
> >               u8 enabled;
> >
> >
>
> I am fine with this patch and all the rest up to 17. They just do not
> apply for me with 1 and 2 left out and only 3 applied.
>

I am sorry, I will recheck.

> Could you resend 3-17 as a series and we can discuss 1 & 2 separately?

okay.

- Alex