netdev - Re: [PATCH] ath: ath6kl: fix error return code of ath6kl_htc_rx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8e28cbdd-55f0-0479-04ee-22f5266ce0ac@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 7 Mar 2021 11:36:19 +0100
From:   Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To:     Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     kvalo@...eaurora.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath: ath6kl: fix error return code of
 ath6kl_htc_rx_bundle()

On 07.03.2021 10:31, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> Hi Leon,
> 
> I am quite sorry for my incorrect patches...
> My static analysis tool reports some possible bugs about error handling code, and thus I write some patches for the bugs that seem to be true in my opinion.
> Because I am not familiar with many device drivers, some of my reported bugs can be false positives...

Then, before posting a patch for a driver, get familiar with it to
an extent that you can identify false positives. Relying on others
to detect the false positives is not the best approach.

> 
> 
> Best wishes,
> Jia-Ju Bai
> 
> On 2021/3/7 17:18, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 01:07:57AM -0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>>> When hif_scatter_req_get() returns NULL to scat_req, no error return
>>> code of ath6kl_htc_rx_bundle() is assigned.
>>> To fix this bug, status is assigned with -EINVAL in this case.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@...nghua.edu.cn>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/htc_mbox.c | 4 +++-
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/htc_mbox.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/htc_mbox.c
>>> index 998947ef63b6..3f8857d19a0c 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/htc_mbox.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath6kl/htc_mbox.c
>>> @@ -1944,8 +1944,10 @@ static int ath6kl_htc_rx_bundle(struct htc_target *target,
>>>
>>>       scat_req = hif_scatter_req_get(target->dev->ar);
>>>
>>> -    if (scat_req == NULL)
>>> +    if (scat_req == NULL) {
>>> +        status = -EINVAL;
>> I'm not sure about it.
>>
>> David. Jakub,
>> Please be warned that patches from this guy are not so great.
>> I looked on 4 patches and 3 of them were wrong (2 in RDMA and 1 for mlx5)
>> plus this patch most likely is incorrect too.
>>