lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210308150405.3694678-2-tobias@waldekranz.com>
Date:   Mon,  8 Mar 2021 16:04:04 +0100
From:   Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        olteanv@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net 1/2] net: dsa: Accept software VLANs for stacked interfaces

The dsa_slave_vlan_rx_{add,kill}_vid ndos are required for hardware
that can not control VLAN filtering per port, rather it is a device
global setting, in order to support VLAN uppers on non-bridged ports.

For hardware that can control VLAN filtering per port, it is perfectly
fine to fallback to software VLANs in this scenario. So, make sure
that this "error" does not leave the DSA layer as vlan_add_vid does
not know the meaning of it.

The blamed commit removed this exemption by not advertising the
feature if the driver did not implement VLAN offloading. But as we
know see, the assumption that if a driver supports VLAN offloading, it
will always use it, does not hold in certain edge cases.

Fixes: 9b236d2a69da ("net: dsa: Advertise the VLAN offload netdev ability only if switch supports it")
Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
---
 net/dsa/slave.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
index 992fcab4b552..64d330f138f5 100644
--- a/net/dsa/slave.c
+++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
@@ -1346,6 +1346,12 @@ static int dsa_slave_vlan_rx_add_vid(struct net_device *dev, __be16 proto,
 	/* User port... */
 	ret = dsa_port_vlan_add(dp, &vlan, &extack);
 	if (ret) {
+		if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP)
+			/* Driver allows the configuration, but is not
+			 * offloading it, which is fine by us.
+			 */
+			goto add_to_master;
+
 		if (extack._msg)
 			netdev_err(dev, "%s\n", extack._msg);
 		return ret;
@@ -1360,6 +1366,7 @@ static int dsa_slave_vlan_rx_add_vid(struct net_device *dev, __be16 proto,
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+add_to_master:
 	return vlan_vid_add(master, proto, vid);
 }
 
@@ -1379,7 +1386,7 @@ static int dsa_slave_vlan_rx_kill_vid(struct net_device *dev, __be16 proto,
 	 * ports which can be members of this VLAN as well.
 	 */
 	err = dsa_port_vlan_del(dp, &vlan);
-	if (err)
+	if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
 		return err;
 
 	vlan_vid_del(master, proto, vid);
-- 
2.25.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ