[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r1kon8hu.fsf@kurt>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2021 07:31:25 +0100
From: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: only unset VLAN filtering when last port leaves last VLAN-aware bridge
Hi Vladimir,
On Mon Mar 08 2021, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
>
> DSA is aware of switches with global VLAN filtering since the blamed
> commit, but it makes a bad decision when multiple bridges are spanning
> the same switch:
>
> ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
> ip link add br1 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
> ip link set swp2 master br0
> ip link set swp3 master br0
> ip link set swp4 master br1
> ip link set swp5 master br1
> ip link set swp5 nomaster
> ip link set swp4 nomaster
> [138665.939930] sja1105 spi0.1: port 3: dsa_core: VLAN filtering is a global setting
> [138665.947514] DSA: failed to notify DSA_NOTIFIER_BRIDGE_LEAVE
>
> When all ports leave br1, DSA blindly attempts to disable VLAN filtering
> on the switch, ignoring the fact that br0 still exists and is VLAN-aware
> too. It fails while doing that.
>
> This patch checks whether any port exists at all and is under a
> VLAN-aware bridge.
>
> Fixes: d371b7c92d19 ("net: dsa: Unset vlan_filtering when ports leave the bridge")
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Code looks correct. One comment below.
> ---
> net/dsa/switch.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/dsa/switch.c b/net/dsa/switch.c
> index 4b5da89dc27a..56ed31b0e636 100644
> --- a/net/dsa/switch.c
> +++ b/net/dsa/switch.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static int dsa_switch_bridge_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> bool unset_vlan_filtering = br_vlan_enabled(info->br);
> struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
> struct netlink_ext_ack extack = {0};
> - int err, i;
> + int err, port;
>
> if (dst->index == info->tree_index && ds->index == info->sw_index &&
> ds->ops->port_bridge_join)
> @@ -124,13 +124,16 @@ static int dsa_switch_bridge_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds,
> * it. That is a good thing, because that lets us handle it and also
> * handle the case where the switch's vlan_filtering setting is global
> * (not per port). When that happens, the correct moment to trigger the
> - * vlan_filtering callback is only when the last port left this bridge.
> + * vlan_filtering callback is only when the last port the last
Somehow "left" got missing. Shouldn't that line be:
"vlan_filtering callback is only when the last port left the last" ?
> + * VLAN-aware bridge.
> */
Thanks,
Kurt
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists