[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb1e13d8-6b7e-ca47-2f65-930dfdb651dc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 16:55:34 +0800
From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@...il.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
marcelo.leitner@...il.com, mkubecek@...e.cz, jbi.octave@...il.com,
yangyingliang@...wei.com, 0x7f454c46@...il.com,
rdunlap@...radead.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: netlink: fix error return code of
netlink_proto_init()
On 2021/3/9 16:47, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 09.03.2021 09:33, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>> When kcalloc() returns NULL to nl_table, no error return code of
>> netlink_proto_init() is assigned.
>> To fix this bug, err is assigned with -ENOMEM in this case.
>>
> Didn't we talk enough about your incorrect patches yesterday?
> This one is incorrect again. panic() never returns.
> Stop sending patches until you understand the code you're changing!
Ah, sorry, I was too confident about this bug report...
Thanks for your reply.
Following your advice, now I am sending the patches only for the bug
reports that I am confident about after careful code review.
Some of the patches have been applied, but some of them are still wrong,
like this patch...
I am sorry for the false positives...
Best wishes,
Jia-Ju Bai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists