[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YEc/8RxroJzrN3xm@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 10:29:21 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mike Ximing Chen <mike.ximing.chen@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
arnd@...db.de, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com,
Gage Eads <gage.eads@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 14/20] dlb: add start domain ioctl
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:54:17AM -0600, Mike Ximing Chen wrote:
> Add ioctl to start a domain. Once a scheduling domain and its resources
> have been configured, this ioctl is called to allow the domain's ports to
> begin enqueueing to the device. Once started, the domain's resources cannot
> be configured again until after the domain is reset.
>
> This ioctl instructs the DLB device to start load-balancing operations.
> It corresponds to rte_event_dev_start() function in DPDK' eventdev library.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gage Eads <gage.eads@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Ximing Chen <mike.ximing.chen@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_ioctl.c | 3 +
> drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_main.h | 4 ++
> drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_pf_ops.c | 9 +++
> drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_resource.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_resource.h | 4 ++
> include/uapi/linux/dlb.h | 22 ++++++
> 6 files changed, 158 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_ioctl.c b/drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_ioctl.c
> index 6a311b969643..9b05344f03c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_ioctl.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ DLB_DOMAIN_IOCTL_CALLBACK_TEMPLATE(create_ldb_queue)
> DLB_DOMAIN_IOCTL_CALLBACK_TEMPLATE(create_dir_queue)
> DLB_DOMAIN_IOCTL_CALLBACK_TEMPLATE(get_ldb_queue_depth)
> DLB_DOMAIN_IOCTL_CALLBACK_TEMPLATE(get_dir_queue_depth)
> +DLB_DOMAIN_IOCTL_CALLBACK_TEMPLATE(start_domain)
>
> /*
> * Port creation ioctls don't use the callback template macro.
> @@ -322,6 +323,8 @@ long dlb_domain_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> return dlb_domain_ioctl_get_dir_port_pp_fd(dlb, dom, arg);
> case DLB_IOC_GET_DIR_PORT_CQ_FD:
> return dlb_domain_ioctl_get_dir_port_cq_fd(dlb, dom, arg);
> + case DLB_IOC_START_DOMAIN:
> + return dlb_domain_ioctl_start_domain(dlb, dom, arg);
> default:
> return -ENOTTY;
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_main.h b/drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_main.h
> index 477974e1a178..2f3096a45b1e 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_main.h
> +++ b/drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_main.h
> @@ -63,6 +63,10 @@ struct dlb_device_ops {
> struct dlb_create_dir_port_args *args,
> uintptr_t cq_dma_base,
> struct dlb_cmd_response *resp);
> + int (*start_domain)(struct dlb_hw *hw,
> + u32 domain_id,
> + struct dlb_start_domain_args *args,
> + struct dlb_cmd_response *resp);
> int (*get_num_resources)(struct dlb_hw *hw,
> struct dlb_get_num_resources_args *args);
> int (*reset_domain)(struct dlb_hw *hw, u32 domain_id);
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_pf_ops.c b/drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_pf_ops.c
> index 02a188aa5a60..ce9d29b94a55 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_pf_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/dlb/dlb_pf_ops.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,14 @@ dlb_pf_create_dir_port(struct dlb_hw *hw, u32 id,
> resp, false, 0);
> }
>
> +static int
> +dlb_pf_start_domain(struct dlb_hw *hw, u32 id,
> + struct dlb_start_domain_args *args,
> + struct dlb_cmd_response *resp)
> +{
> + return dlb_hw_start_domain(hw, id, args, resp, false, 0);
> +}
> +
> static int dlb_pf_get_num_resources(struct dlb_hw *hw,
> struct dlb_get_num_resources_args *args)
> {
> @@ -232,6 +240,7 @@ struct dlb_device_ops dlb_pf_ops = {
> .create_dir_queue = dlb_pf_create_dir_queue,
> .create_ldb_port = dlb_pf_create_ldb_port,
> .create_dir_port = dlb_pf_create_dir_port,
> + .start_domain = dlb_pf_start_domain,
Why do you have a "callback" when you only ever call one function? Why
is that needed at all?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists