lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210310005132.mzfzkxtpo3hjnsts@skbuf>
Date:   Wed, 10 Mar 2021 02:51:32 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, vivien.didelot@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net] net: dsa: Centralize validation of VLAN configuration

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 01:30:33AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:28:11PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
> 
> Hi Tobias
> 
> As with Florian, i've not been following the discussion.

I'm afraid there isn't much context for these patches, except Tobias
pointing out that some of the command sequences I've since spelled out
in the selftest produce results that should be refused but aren't.

But this discussion has actually branched off and into the weeds from a
completely different problem. Tobias reported that DSA attempts to
install VLANs for 8021q uppers into the VTU when the mv88e6xxx ports are
standalone, and the driver doesn't like that. This isn't due to an
invalid constellation, but instead due to improper management of a valid
one.

I've attempted to solve those issues through these three patches, which
at the moment are not properly grouped together, but I think I will pull
them out and send them separately, and let Tobias finish the central
rejection of invalid VLAN constellations:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210308135509.3040286-1-olteanv@gmail.com/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210309021657.3639745-4-olteanv@gmail.com/
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20210309021657.3639745-5-olteanv@gmail.com/

It would be nice if you could take a look at those three patches before
I resend them tomorrow, also for Tobias to let me know if they fix the
issue he initially reported.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ