netdev - Re: [RFC net-next v2 1/3] devlink: move health state to uAPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210311074734.GN4652@nanopsycho.orion>
Date:   Thu, 11 Mar 2021 08:47:34 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     f242ed68-d31b-527d-562f-c5a35123861a@...el.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, saeedm@...dia.com,
        andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
        guglielmo.morandin@...adcom.com, eugenem@...com,
        eranbe@...lanox.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 1/3] devlink: move health state to uAPI

Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 04:26:11AM CET, kuba@...nel.org wrote:
>Move the health states into uAPI, so applications can use them.
>
>Note that we need to change the name of the enum because
>user space is likely already defining the same values.
>E.g. iproute2 does.
>
>Use this opportunity to shorten the names.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>---
> .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c  |  4 ++--
> .../ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en/health.c    |  4 ++--
> include/net/devlink.h                          |  7 +------
> include/uapi/linux/devlink.h                   | 12 ++++++++++++
> net/core/devlink.c                             | 18 +++++++++---------
> 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c
>index 64381be935a8..cafc98ab4b5e 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_devlink.c
>@@ -252,9 +252,9 @@ void bnxt_dl_health_status_update(struct bnxt *bp, bool healthy)
> 	u8 state;
> 
> 	if (healthy)
>-		state = DEVLINK_HEALTH_REPORTER_STATE_HEALTHY;
>+		state = DL_HEALTH_STATE_HEALTHY;
> 	else
>-		state = DEVLINK_HEALTH_REPORTER_STATE_ERROR;
>+		state = DL_HEALTH_STATE_ERROR;

I don't like the inconsistencies in the uapi (DL/DEVLINK). Can't we
stick with "DEVLINK" prefix for all, which is what we got so far?