[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210311115115.GA12530@netronome.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:51:15 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
yisen.zhuang@...wei.com, salil.mehta@...wei.com,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, drivers@...sando.io,
snelson@...sando.io, netanel@...zon.com, akiyano@...zon.com,
gtzalik@...zon.com, saeedb@...zon.com,
GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com, skalluru@...vell.com,
rmody@...vell.com, kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com,
sthemmin@...rosoft.com, wei.liu@...nel.org, mst@...hat.com,
jasowang@...hat.com, pv-drivers@...are.com, doshir@...are.com,
alexanderduyck@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/10] nfp: Replace nfp_pr_et with ethtool_gsprintf
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 05:35:32PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> From: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
>
> The nfp_pr_et function is nearly identical to ethtool_gsprintf except for
> the fact that it passes the pointer by value and as a return whereas
> ethtool_gsprintf passes it as a pointer.
>
> Since they are so close just update nfp to make use of ethtool_gsprintf
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists