netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Qualify phydev->dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210311003644.tmfk6klpojrp66hg@skbuf>
Date:   Thu, 11 Mar 2021 02:36:44 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: bcm_sf2: Qualify phydev->dev_flags based
 on port

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 02:17:58PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Similar to commit 92696286f3bb37ba50e4bd8d1beb24afb759a799 ("net:
> bcmgenet: Set phydev->dev_flags only for internal PHYs") we need to
> qualify the phydev->dev_flags based on whether the port is connected to
> an internal or external PHY otherwise we risk having a flags collision
> with a completely different interpretation depending on the driver.
> 
> Fixes: aa9aef77c761 ("net: dsa: bcm_sf2: communicate integrated PHY revision to PHY driver")
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
> index 1277e5f48b7f..321924a241f8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2.c
> @@ -643,7 +643,10 @@ static u32 bcm_sf2_sw_get_phy_flags(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
>  	 * in bits 15:8 and the patch level in bits 7:0 which is exactly what
>  	 * the REG_PHY_REVISION register layout is.
>  	 */
> -	return priv->hw_params.gphy_rev;
> +	if (priv->int_phy_mask & BIT(port))
> +		return priv->hw_params.gphy_rev;
> +	else
> +		return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static void bcm_sf2_sw_validate(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Checkpatch probably tells you that "else" statements are not useful
after "return", but either way, this is good.

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>