netdev - Re: [PATCH V3 3/6] vDPA/ifcvf: rename original IFCVF dev ids to N3000 ids

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4472d8f3-ef44-37a0-8ee1-82caa4a0a843@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:23:48 +0800
From:   Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>, mst@...hat.com,
        lulu@...hat.com, leonro@...dia.com
Cc:     virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/6] vDPA/ifcvf: rename original IFCVF dev ids to N3000
 ids



On 3/11/2021 11:25 AM, Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On 2021/3/10 5:00 下午, Zhu Lingshan wrote:
>> IFCVF driver probes multiple types of devices now,
>> to distinguish the original device driven by IFCVF
>> from others, it is renamed as "N3000".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 8 ++++----
>>   drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 8 ++++----
>>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h 
>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
>> index 75d9a8052039..794d1505d857 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
>> @@ -18,10 +18,10 @@
>>   #include <uapi/linux/virtio_config.h>
>>   #include <uapi/linux/virtio_pci.h>
>>   -#define IFCVF_VENDOR_ID        0x1AF4
>> -#define IFCVF_DEVICE_ID        0x1041
>> -#define IFCVF_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID    0x8086
>> -#define IFCVF_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID    0x001A
>> +#define N3000_VENDOR_ID        0x1AF4
>> +#define N3000_DEVICE_ID        0x1041
>> +#define N3000_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID    0x8086
>> +#define N3000_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID    0x001A
>>     #define C5000X_PL_VENDOR_ID        0x1AF4
>>   #define C5000X_PL_DEVICE_ID        0x1000
>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c 
>> b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
>> index 26a2dab7ca66..fd5befc5cbcc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
>> @@ -480,10 +480,10 @@ static void ifcvf_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>   }
>>     static struct pci_device_id ifcvf_pci_ids[] = {
>> -    { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(IFCVF_VENDOR_ID,
>> -        IFCVF_DEVICE_ID,
>> -        IFCVF_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID,
>> -        IFCVF_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) },
>> +    { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(N3000_VENDOR_ID,
>> +             N3000_DEVICE_ID,
>
>
> I am not sure the plan for Intel but I wonder if we can simply use 
> PCI_ANY_ID for device id here. Otherewise you need to maintain a very 
> long list of ids here.
>
> Thanks
Hi Jason,

Thanks! but maybe if we present a very simple and clear list like what 
e1000 does can help the users understand what we support easily.

Thanks!
>
>
>> + N3000_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID,
>> +             N3000_SUBSYS_DEVICE_ID) },
>>       { PCI_DEVICE_SUB(C5000X_PL_VENDOR_ID,
>>                C5000X_PL_DEVICE_ID,
>>                C5000X_PL_SUBSYS_VENDOR_ID,
>