[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ec5baac1-1410-86e4-a0d1-7c7f982a0810@amazon.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:18:02 +0100
From: "Hsu, Chiahao" <andyhsu@...zon.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <wei.liu@...nel.org>, <paul@....org>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next 1/2] xen-netback: add module parameter to disable ctrl-ring
Andrew Lunn 於 2021/3/12 15:52 寫道:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 10:59:44PM +0000, ChiaHao Hsu wrote:
>> In order to support live migration of guests between kernels
>> that do and do not support 'feature-ctrl-ring', we add a
>> module parameter that allows the feature to be disabled
>> at run time, instead of using hardcode value.
>> The default value is enable.
> Hi ChiaHao
>
> There is a general dislike for module parameters. What other mechanisms
> have you looked at? Would an ethtool private flag work?
>
> Andrew
Hi Andrew,
I can survey other mechanisms, however before I start doing that,
could you share more details about what the problem is with using module
parameters? thanks.
ChiaHao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists