[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210312101847.7391bb8c@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:18:47 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
Neil Spring <ntspring@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] tcp: better deal with delayed TX
completions
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:35:03 -0800 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> Jakub and Neil reported an increase of RTO timers whenever
> TX completions are delayed a bit more (by increasing
> NIC TX coalescing parameters)
>
> While problems have been there forever, second patch might
> introduce some regressions so I prefer not backport
> them to stable releases before things settle.
>
> Many thanks to FB team for their help and tests.
>
> Few packetdrill tests need to be changed to reflect
> the improvements brought by this series.
FWIW I run some workloads with this for a day and looks good:
Tested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Thank you!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists