[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tupccyin.fsf@kurt>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 14:55:12 +0100
From: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
To: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] taprio: Handle short intervals and large packets
On Fri Mar 12 2021, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
> My first worry was whether the segments had the same tstamp as their
> parent, and it seems that they do, so everything should just work with
> etf or the txtime-assisted mode.
>
> I just want to play with this patch a bit and see how it works in
> practice. But it looks good.
OK, thanks for testing. Most likely the segmentation can be skipped with
full offloading applied.
I'll also test a bit more, before sending a non-RFC version.
Thanks,
Kurt
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (833 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists