netdev - [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Remove some bureaucracy around querying the VTU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Mar 2021 22:13:57 +0100
From:   Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        olteanv@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Remove some bureaucracy around querying the VTU

The hardware has a somewhat quirky protocol for reading out the VTU
entry for a particular VID. But there is no reason why we cannot
create a better API for ourselves in the driver.

Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 45 ++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
index c70d4b7db4f5..86027e98d83d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
@@ -1472,13 +1472,23 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_vtu_setup(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip)
 	return mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_flush(chip);
 }
 
-static int mv88e6xxx_vtu_getnext(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
-				 struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry)
+static int mv88e6xxx_vtu_get(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, u16 vid,
+			     struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry)
 {
+	int err;
+
 	if (!chip->info->ops->vtu_getnext)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	return chip->info->ops->vtu_getnext(chip, entry);
+	entry->vid = vid - 1;
+	entry->valid = false;
+
+	err = chip->info->ops->vtu_getnext(chip, entry);
+
+	if (entry->vid != vid)
+		entry->valid = false;
+
+	return err;
 }
 
 static int mv88e6xxx_vtu_walk(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
@@ -1585,19 +1595,13 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_port_check_hw_vlan(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
 	if (dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, port) || dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port))
 		return 0;
 
-	vlan.vid = vid - 1;
-	vlan.valid = false;
-
-	err = mv88e6xxx_vtu_getnext(chip, &vlan);
+	err = mv88e6xxx_vtu_get(chip, vid, &vlan);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
 	if (!vlan.valid)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (vlan.vid != vid)
-		return 0;
-
 	for (i = 0; i < mv88e6xxx_num_ports(chip); ++i) {
 		if (dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, i) || dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, i))
 			continue;
@@ -1679,15 +1683,12 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_port_db_load_purge(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 	} else {
-		vlan.vid = vid - 1;
-		vlan.valid = false;
-
-		err = mv88e6xxx_vtu_getnext(chip, &vlan);
+		err = mv88e6xxx_vtu_get(chip, vid, &vlan);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 
 		/* switchdev expects -EOPNOTSUPP to honor software VLANs */
-		if (vlan.vid != vid || !vlan.valid)
+		if (!vlan.valid)
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
 		fid = vlan.fid;
@@ -1964,14 +1965,11 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_join(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
 	struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry vlan;
 	int i, err;
 
-	vlan.vid = vid - 1;
-	vlan.valid = false;
-
-	err = mv88e6xxx_vtu_getnext(chip, &vlan);
+	err = mv88e6xxx_vtu_get(chip, vid, &vlan);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	if (vlan.vid != vid || !vlan.valid) {
+	if (!vlan.valid) {
 		memset(&vlan, 0, sizeof(vlan));
 
 		err = mv88e6xxx_atu_new(chip, &vlan.fid);
@@ -2067,17 +2065,14 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_port_vlan_leave(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
 	if (!vid)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	vlan.vid = vid - 1;
-	vlan.valid = false;
-
-	err = mv88e6xxx_vtu_getnext(chip, &vlan);
+	err = mv88e6xxx_vtu_get(chip, vid, &vlan);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
 	/* If the VLAN doesn't exist in hardware or the port isn't a member,
 	 * tell switchdev that this VLAN is likely handled in software.
 	 */
-	if (vlan.vid != vid || !vlan.valid ||
+	if (!vlan.valid ||
 	    vlan.member[port] == MV88E6XXX_G1_VTU_DATA_MEMBER_TAG_NON_MEMBER)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-- 
2.25.1