[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFC65sQVaJIM3dl0@shredder.lan>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 16:04:22 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 12/12] Documentation: networking: switchdev:
fix command for static FDB entries
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 01:24:19PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
>
> The "bridge fdb add" command provided in the switchdev documentation is
> junk now, not only because it is syntactically incorrect and rejected by
> the iproute2 bridge program, but also because it was not updated in
> light of Arkadi Sharshevsky's radical switchdev refactoring in commit
> 29ab586c3d83 ("net: switchdev: Remove bridge bypass support from
> switchdev"). Try to explain what the intended usage pattern is with the
> new kernel implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists