[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f08f5da3-3e60-1f17-f26f-71be48b46b28@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 03:17:28 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"dong.menglong@....com.cn" <dong.menglong@....com.cn>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND net-next] net: socket: use BIT() for MSG_*
On 3/17/21 2:40 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:36 AM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 10:21 AM Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com> wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> It maybe fixed by swapping positions of the arguments, i.e. ~(FOO |
>> BAR) & flags.
>
> ...and type casting will be needed anyway here...
>
> I was thinking about this case
>
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c:420:
> dev->sda_hold_time & ~(u32)DW_IC_SDA_HOLD_RX_MASK
> ,
> > but sda_hold_time there is unsigned.
>
That is needed because of the %d. Without the (u32), the expression is
promoted to unsigned long and the compiler wants to see %ld.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists