[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFSfrIZAz6zHENT7@google.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:57:16 +0000
From: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
To: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
Cc: selinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Jeff Vander Stoep <jeffv@...gle.com>,
Alistair Delva <adelva@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selinux: vsock: Set SID for socket returned by accept()
Hi Paul,
I'll post a v2 shortly but will address your comments here.
> > include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 7 +++++++
> > include/linux/security.h | 5 +++++
> > net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 1 +
> > security/security.c | 5 +++++
> > security/selinux/hooks.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > 6 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> Additional comments below, but I think it would be a good idea for you
> to test your patches on a more traditional Linux distribution as well
> as Android.
>
No problem, I was going to add a test case into selinux-testsuite
anyway. Done now (link in v2) and tested on Fedora 33 with v5.12-rc3.
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > index 5546710d8ac1..a9bf3b90cb2f 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
> > @@ -755,6 +755,7 @@ static struct sock *__vsock_create(struct net *net,
> > vsk->buffer_size = psk->buffer_size;
> > vsk->buffer_min_size = psk->buffer_min_size;
> > vsk->buffer_max_size = psk->buffer_max_size;
> > + security_vsock_sk_clone(parent, sk);
>
> Did you try calling the existing security_sk_clone() hook here? I
> would be curious to hear why it doesn't work in this case.
>
> Feel free to educate me on AF_VSOCK, it's entirely possible I'm
> misunderstanding something here :)
>
No, you're completely right. security_sk_clone does what's needed here.
Adding a new hook was me trying to mimic other socket families going via
selinux_conn_sid. Happy to reuse the existing hook - makes this a nice
oneliner. :)
Please note that I'm marking v2 with 'Fixes' for backporting. This does
feel to me like a bug, an integration that was never considered. Please
shout if you disagree.
-David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists