[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALW65janF_yztk7hH5n8wZFpWXxbCwQu3m4W=B-n2mcNG+W=Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:29:12 +0800
From: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Vadym Kochan <vkochan@...vell.com>,
Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 14/16] net: dsa: don't set
skb->offload_fwd_mark when not offloading the bridge
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 5:06 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This is a good point actually, which I thought about, but did not give a
> lot of importance to for the moment. Either we go full steam ahead with
> assisted learning on the CPU port for everybody, and we selectively
> learn the addresses relevant to the bridging funciton only, or we do
> what you say, but then it will be a little bit more complicated IMO, and
> have hardware dependencies, which isn't as nice.
Are skb->offload_fwd_mark and source DSA switch kept in dsa_slave_xmit?
I think SA learning should be bypassed iff skb->offload_fwd_mark == 1 and
source DSA switch == destination DSA switch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists