[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFeAdxAOYcx3CMYJ@shredder.lan>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 19:20:55 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Petr Machata <petrm@...lanox.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>,
Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: forwarding: vxlan_bridge_1d: Fix vxlan
ecn decapsulate value
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:33:14PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> The ECN bit defines ECT(1) = 1, ECT(0) = 2. So inner 0x02 + outer 0x01
> should be inner ECT(0) + outer ECT(1). Based on the description of
> __INET_ECN_decapsulate, the final decapsulate value should be
> ECT(1). So fix the test expect value to 0x01.
>
> Before the fix:
> TEST: VXLAN: ECN decap: 01/02->0x02 [FAIL]
> Expected to capture 10 packets, got 0.
>
> After the fix:
> TEST: VXLAN: ECN decap: 01/02->0x01 [ OK ]
>
> Fixes: a0b61f3d8ebf ("selftests: forwarding: vxlan_bridge_1d: Add an ECN decap test")
> Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Fixes: b723748750ec ("tunnel: Propagate ECT(1) when decapsulating as recommended by RFC6040")
The commit you cited is from 2018 whereas this one is from 2020. The
test stopped working after the latter. The reason I didn't see it is
because this commit only changed one caller of __INET_ECN_decapsulate().
Another caller is mlxsw which uses the function to understand how to
program the hardware to perform decapsulation. See commit 28e450333d4d
("inet: Refactor INET_ECN_decapsulate()").
After your patch I get:
TEST: VXLAN: ECN decap: 01/02->0x01 [FAIL]
Expected to capture 10 packets, got 0.
Fixed by:
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ipip.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ipip.c
index b8b08a6a1d10..61eb34e20fde 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ipip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ipip.c
@@ -341,7 +341,12 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_ipip_ecn_decap_init_one(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
u8 new_inner_ecn;
trap_en = __INET_ECN_decapsulate(outer_ecn, inner_ecn, &set_ce);
- new_inner_ecn = set_ce ? INET_ECN_CE : inner_ecn;
+ if (set_ce)
+ new_inner_ecn = INET_ECN_CE;
+ else if (outer_ecn == INET_ECN_ECT_1)
+ new_inner_ecn = INET_ECN_ECT_1;
+ else
+ new_inner_ecn = inner_ecn;
mlxsw_reg_tidem_pack(tidem_pl, outer_ecn, inner_ecn, new_inner_ecn,
trap_en, trap_en ? MLXSW_TRAP_ID_DECAP_ECN0 : 0);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_nve.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_nve.c
index e5ec595593f4..74f2c4ce7063 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_nve.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_nve.c
@@ -913,7 +913,12 @@ static int __mlxsw_sp_nve_ecn_decap_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
u8 new_inner_ecn;
trap_en = !!__INET_ECN_decapsulate(outer_ecn, inner_ecn, &set_ce);
- new_inner_ecn = set_ce ? INET_ECN_CE : inner_ecn;
+ if (set_ce)
+ new_inner_ecn = INET_ECN_CE;
+ else if (outer_ecn == INET_ECN_ECT_1)
+ new_inner_ecn = INET_ECN_ECT_1;
+ else
+ new_inner_ecn = inner_ecn;
mlxsw_reg_tndem_pack(tndem_pl, outer_ecn, inner_ecn, new_inner_ecn,
trap_en, trap_en ? MLXSW_TRAP_ID_DECAP_ECN0 : 0);
I will prepare a patch
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh
> index ce6bea9675c0..0ccb1dda099a 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/forwarding/vxlan_bridge_1d.sh
> @@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ test_ecn_decap()
> # In accordance with INET_ECN_decapsulate()
> __test_ecn_decap 00 00 0x00
> __test_ecn_decap 01 01 0x01
> - __test_ecn_decap 02 01 0x02
> + __test_ecn_decap 02 01 0x01
> __test_ecn_decap 01 03 0x03
> __test_ecn_decap 02 03 0x03
> test_ecn_decap_error
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists